How well did Chicago Cubs player-managers perform?

(Photo by Mark Rucker/Transcendental Graphics, Getty Images)
(Photo by Mark Rucker/Transcendental Graphics, Getty Images)
1 of 3
Next
(Photo by David Banks/Getty Images)
(Photo by David Banks/Getty Images) /

In its infancy, baseball was quite different from what we know today. Crappy fields. Irregular schedules. Same dude pitching every game. Loud Guy on your team and Other Loud Guy on the other team berating each other, usually verbally but sometimes physically, leaving the rest to wonder whether this was really the best way to spend a warm Saturday afternoon. And, most importantly for our purposes here, player-managers.

In 1880, Cap Anson’s first full year as a major league manager, the National League consisted of eight teams. Seven had player-managers. (The only team that didn’t was the ill-starred Worcester Ruby Legs, who would last just two more seasons and never finish over .500. However, they are in the top 20 on the all-time Names Above Average list.) The practice made sense: owners saved a salary and it was a relatively cheap way to give additional recognition to star players. But the increasing complexity of the game and specialization of roles led to the concept’s demise.

The Chicago Cubs have had 12 player-managers in their long history, starting of course with Anson, and ending with … well, you’ll have to read the next post in this series to find out. The history of Cubs’ player-managers parallels that of the player-manager job itself: beginning with a bang and ending with a whimper. In this post we’ll look at the Cubs’ player-managers through 1916, and the next will examine the rest. In the stat lines, the range of years refers to the years the player both played and managed for the Cubs.

(Photo by Brian D. Kersey/Getty Images)
(Photo by Brian D. Kersey/Getty Images) /

Chicago Cubs: The first two names on this list are franchise legends

Cap Anson (1879-97), 1282-932, .579, 5 pennants

Anson has the most wins of any Cubs manager. A dominating figure in every respect, Anson was often Chicago’s best player and always team president Albert Spalding’s chief lieutenant on the field. Anson was something of an innovator, pioneering the idea of spring training and playing an aggressive, hard-running style of baseball that would later come to be associated with John McGraw, though Anson’s 1890 claim to have invented the hit-and-run play must be greeted with skepticism.

Anson was an innovator in another way: like a famous player-manager of more recent vintage, Anson bet on baseball. A lot. Fifty-seven times if you’re keeping score at home. However, he does seem to have bet on his own squad to win, and that they did in abundance for most of his tenure.

Frank Chance (1905-12), 768-389, .664, 4 pennants, 2 World Series crowns

Chance has the highest winning percentage of any Cubs manager with at least 315 games under his belt. He was a big man with a bad temper and no compunction in showing it. In Chance we see a template for the a**-ripping, vein-bulging, drill-sergeant type of manager who would feature prominently in the game until relatively recently. His teams were regularly first or second in the league in runs scored and allowed, though the pitching started slipping a bit toward the end of his tenure.

These were patient squads at the plate, regularly beating the league average walk rate, and often at or the near the top in runs scored percentage. It’s hard to measure manager performance, but these are variables over which the manager has some control, and Chance seems to have exercised it well.

Owner Charles Murphy would fire Chance after the two got into a shouting match in Chance’s hospital room as he recovered from brain surgery.

(Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)
(Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images) /

Chicago Cubs: With more time, came less success from player-managers

Johnny Evers (1913), 88-65, .575

Murphy’s defenestration of Chance led to a turbulent period in the Cubs’ dugout. First onto the carousel was Johnny Evers, who Murphy signed to a five-year contract as a player-manager. The stat line gave it away: this did not work out. The walk and runs scored rates for the Evers’ Cubs continued to be very good, though their stolen base rate was poor. Evers’ record was a respectable one, but good only for third in the NL, miles behind the hated New York Giants. Murphy fired him after the 1913 season.

Murphy was at least as volatile as Evers, and the marriage was probably never going to end well. But the controversy ended worse for Murphy, as the league eased him out of his ownership role. These were tumultuous times: The NL did not want to lose a big name star like Evers to the upstart Federal League. For his part, Murphy likely realized that the Cubs’ fortunes were running out of road; the 1913 squad was the oldest in the NL. Even back then, it was easier to replace the manager than the players, and the Cubs had largely failed to develop replacements for their aging roster.

Evers would meet a happier fate; he still had two good years left playing for the Boston Braves before his springs began to pop. He would even return to manage the Cubs for part of the 1921 season, though by then he was strictly a dugout presence.

Roger Bresnahan (1915), 73-80, .477

Between 1912 and 1920, Hall of Fame starter Hippo Vaughn had one below average year. Unfortunately for Roger Bresnahan, that year was 1915. Between 1912 and 1916 non-Hall of Fame starter George Pierce had one above average year. Unfortunately for Roger Bresnahan, that year was not 1915. Their 450 innings probably killed Bresnahan’s chances of having a successful season. The team’s walk and runs scored rates also plummeted, which certainly didn’t help. This would be his last season in organized ball, but he did bequeath shin guards and padded helmets to the grateful catchers who came afterwards.

Joe Tinker (1916), 67-86, .438

And so it came to pass that all three of the fabled Cubs infielders ended up managing the team. The pitching got better this year, but the hitting got worse. Tinker used 15 different players at second and short, and as the saying goes, if you have 15 middle infielders you don’t have any. At age 35, Tinker was smart enough not to put himself in the lineup all that much, and it’s hard to blame him for all the flux at these positions; these just weren’t very good players.

Next. You'll see some crossover on our list of greatest Cubs. dark

Cubbies Crib
Cubbies Crib /

Want your voice heard? Join the Cubbies Crib team!

Write for us!

The Tinker Cubs didn’t walk and for the most part didn’t run well, thought they were good at taking the extra base. It wasn’t enough, and Tinker would neither manage nor play again. But don’t feel too sorry for the Joe: He did pilot the Chicago Whales to the Federal League pennant  in 1915.

Next