Chicago Cubs: What plan is the best for the team?

Wrigley Field, Chicago Cubs (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Wrigley Field, Chicago Cubs (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
1 of 4
Next
Chicago Cubs
Chicago Cubs (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images) /

What’s the best plan for the Chicago Cubs? Is it the three-city plan? Or the Chase Field and the 10 surrounding spring training parks. Maybe it’s playing at Wrigley Field–but without people.

Three plans for the Chicago Cubs. Which one is best? Suppose it’s how you see it. We will look at them one-by-one and find out what’s best for the Cubs. There’s caution in some of the plans. Some will require ‘quarantine,’ as the Chase Field and the 10 surrounding spring training ballparks will entail.

So what’s best for the players, coaches and managers of the team? Will they undergo coronavirus testing? Will they be quarantined? These are the questions they need to ask. Under the circumstances, ‘star’ players will probably refuse to play. And to be honest? That would suck, as Scott Boras touched on.

"“You’re going to have an identified group of people. You’re going to have a constantly tested group of people, Boras said. And you’re going to have a very limited access of those people to the outside world so that you can assure a very uncontaminated league, if you will, to produce a product that is inspirational to our country.” h/t Nick Piecoro, Arizona Republic"

So we’ll look at each plan and weigh the pros and cons. We’ll look at it and decide which is best for the Cubs.