Chicago Cubs: A new take on bringing the designated hitter to the NL
Discussion surrounding the designated hitter has raged since the 1970s. Are the Chicago Cubs well-built for such a proposal? Let’s dive in on the matter.
In recent years, the debate around the designated hitter has picked up steam. Major League Baseball certainly seems to be heading toward instilling a full-time DH in both leagues sooner rather than later. Buck Showalter recently espoused an idea regarding the designated hitter that might appease some fans of National League baseball (I’m looking at you, Chicago Cubs fans, while offering a more consistent approach across the game.
Ron Blomberg‘s 3-2 walk against Luis Tiant on Opening Day 1973 marked the first time a designated hitter was ever used in Major League Baseball. While the idea had been proposed and knocked around as early as 1906, when legendary manager Connie Mack championed the idea, it wasn’t until Charlie Finley’s push in the 1970’s that the rule was actually instituted and put in place in the American League.
Finley’s push was financially motivated, as he believed more fans would come to games if there were more offense in those games, and the American League trailed the Senior Circuit in both categories at that point in baseball’s history. Ever since, it has created controversy, angst and lots of spirited debate spanning the gamut of fans about whether to keep it, expand it or get rid of it altogether.
Chicago Cubs: Would the DH actually improve the Cubs’ lineup?
Fast forward 45 years and the National and American Leagues still play under different rules. While numerous changes have been made since 1973 to give fans in both leagues exposure to the DH (including changes in World Series formats, interleague play and All-Star Games), the rule is used almost unilaterally in every other level of the game.
The Minor Leagues use the designated hitter. As does the NCAA and high school baseball leagues across the nation. Basically, the only league that does not use the DH is the one that never has and has always been against the usage of such: the National League. And, as fate would have it, the Chicago Cubs just happen to be in said National League, so it’s an issue that fans often bring up and enjoy banter about because it might just be fun to have nine actual hitters in the lineup. Or, it might not.
So, let’s discuss Showalter’s posit: what if we implemented the DH across all of baseball, but we used it only until the starting pitcher is pulled from the game? Every game would start with a DH in the pitcher’s spot (if the manager prefers, of course – or you could use your pitcher as the DH – looking at you Shohei Ohtani), but when you took out your starting pitcher, you’d also lose your designated hitter.
Managers would then be forced into a double switch, pinch hitter or just letting the relief pitcher hit for himself. Sounds like the American League for five or six innings and then the National League for the rest of the game. It also seems like it would affect strategy in terms of when to take out your pitcher, who to bring in, which pinch hitters to use and basically gives you the best of both worlds for NL and AL fans alike.
The problem with the idea is, of course, that fans fall into one of three categories regarding the designated hitter and its use. They hate it and don’t think it should be adopted in the NL, they are open to the idea of some form or machination of the DH in both leagues, or they love the idea and absolutely believe that the NL should implement the rule in every game as soon as yesterday.
I’m not going to sway opinion or curry favor for my idea with those who fall into the first category. Your minds are made up. I hope you read on and consider this particular idea if that applies to you, but I understand if you stop reading now; you’re intransigent and I don’t blame you – the National League has been producing great baseball for 142 years.
If you fall into the other categories, however, I suggest you listen to this clip from MLB Network (also linked at the beginning of the article) and then continue reading.
Chicago Cubs: Let’s not watch Jon Lester take at-bats, eh?
While Jon Lester has become a much better hitter in his time with the Cubs, and many Cubs’ fans would have rather seen him hit than Jason Heyward in 2016 or 2017, he’s still only a career .093 hitter in 270 at-bats.
Does anyone want to see pitchers hit? That’s the first question you need to ask yourself if you’re embroiled in the DH discussion. The answer, for most fans, is an emphatic “no.” We do get the occasional home run or great at-bat from a pitcher. But we are also treated to Carl Edwards Jr. not being able to hit the broad side of the barn while throwing to Yu Darvish in the 2017 NLCS. In other words, we are subjected to endless whiffs, awkward swings and weak contact from our favorite hurlers while they try and fend off their opposite number in the batter’s box. Most relief pitchers are so bad at the plate, managers go out of their way to avoid having them ever hit in any meaningful context.
More from Chicago Cubs News
- Cubs starting pitching has been thriving on the North Side
- Make no mistake: the Cubs are very much about power hitters
- Cubs: It’s time to start thinking about potential September call-ups
- Cubs: P.J. Higgins deserves to be in the lineup on a daily basis
- Cubs might start to limit Justin Steele’s workload soon
Then, there’s the question of injury. Pitchers don’t hit a lot. They’re paid to pitch. Swinging a baseball bat is a somewhat violent series of movements for anyone’s body to undergo. Attempting to sprint full speed after violently swinging could also be dangerous if you don’t often do it, even for athletic people. If a pitcher is hurt while hitting, they can’t pitch (Don’t need to remind any Cubs fans about this particular one).
If you’re investing millions of dollars in a guy to paint murals and only paint murals, you certainly don’t want to see him put a nail through his hand trying to wield a pneumatic nail gun because you were running out of carpenters that day. Doing something that is potentially harmful and also foreign to your body (if you’ve only ever pitched in the AL and then come to the NL), leads to throwing away at-bats, pointless bunting and embarrassing displays of athleticism from otherwise elite players.
Pitchers, in some cases, have never really hit. If you are an elite pitcher and have always focused on pitching, eschewing a bat and the need to hit, you’ve never honed that craft. You grew up sitting on the bench and resting while your high school, college and Minor League team was hitting. Then, all of a sudden when you finally make it to the apex of your profession, you’re suddenly thrust into doing something you’ve never really practiced and never really cared about.
You’re made to do something that had nothing to do with your ability to get guys out while standing on the rubber. As a big leaguer, coaches tell you to go up there against guys who throw better than anyone else on the planet and make it work. Oh, and by the way; if you’re a pitcher, the way you hit has nothing to do with how much you get paid and how much someone is willing to pay you. (Hi, Yu Darvish!)
By implementing the designated in the NL (to any degree, really), you’d be taking the bat out of the hands of guys who really shouldn’t even be swinging them. They haven’t and don’t practice hitting nearly as much as the other eight guys in the order and they’re not the best product for the fans who come to the game. Taking the bat out of their hands (quite literally) also saves them from potential injuries while hitting, bunting and running – while limiting extra fatigue.
Chicago Cubs: A DH would create consistency fans yearn for
While the game seems different in the two respective leagues, many fans question that consistency and roster equality within the game, as well as inherent advantages for either/both league depending on where the game is being played.
The NBA doesn’t prohibit Zach LaVine from dunking while at the United Center and then let him do it all he wants in Los Angeles. The NHL doesn’t make Cam Ward leave his glove in the locker room for games in the Metropolitan Division, and then let him use it elsewhere. The NFL doesn’t eliminate punting in games played in the AFC, then make everyone punt in games at Soldier Field in the NFC. While most baseball fans will say they are different (and better) than other sports’ fans, it’s a legitimate argument – why does MLB play the game differently and under different rules within the same overarching league?
Right now, many American League clubs carry an extra hitter whose sole purpose is to be a DH. While some clubs have gone away from this idea and have begun using the designated hitter as a means to give position players rest and a semi-day off, there are still guys like J.D. Martinez, Nelson Cruz, Khris Davis, Chris Davis, Albert Pujols, etc. who are being penciled into the DH slot more often than not. Martinez, specifically, just signed a five-year, $110 million contract to be the DH in a town where their most famous player for a decade was a… you guessed it – a designated hitter in Big Papi (David Ortiz).
This roster configuration is totally different than the National League where teams need to be more flexible and consider bench players, defensive replacements and pinch hitters much more carefully. This rings especially true in the late innings when starting pitchers come out of the game and managers have to do their best to avoid having their relief pitchers hit under any circumstance.
Roster construction is totally different and forces teams to play different games of roster Jenga based on what league they play in, but do it while under the same constraints of a 25-man active roster.
(Speaking of roster construction; adding a DH of any sort to the National League would likely mean baseball would have to add a 26th man to the active roster, something the MLBPA would sign off on immediately, as it would mean 30 extra MLB players at all times).
Regardless of which league you think has an inherent advantage when teams meet head-to-head in interleague play, the American League has held the advantage in interleague games in 17 of 22 years since it was first introduced in 1997. In fact, 2018 was the first year the National League held the edge in 15 years, suggesting there may be some advantages that generally make it easier for a team used to employing a designated hitter.
By creating a level playing field, there would be no more speculation about which league has a harder or easier time adjusting and adapting to the DH rule that remains inconsistent based on where teams play that particular day. It would also mean that the game’s crown jewel event, the World Series, would be played under the same conditions and rules in each of the possible seven games of the series.
Chicago Cubs: ‘That’s not how the game was meant to be played’
Strategy and “baseball the way baseball was meant to be played” is the drum that many NL fans beat when discussing limitations and problems with adding the designated hitter to the NL. What if that same strategy was kept, but in a slightly different way?
So you’re saying you love the mind games and strategy NL skippers have to handle on a daily basis. You love the question of whether or not to leave a pitcher in one hitter too many because his spot is coming up in the batting order. You love a manager making double switches and choosing which players to take out and who to put in. You love vacillating over whether Kyle Hendricks should bunt or swing away with a man on second and one out. What if I told you that you could have your cake (or Cracker Jack) and eat it too? Sort of, at least.
More from Cubbies Crib
- Cubs starting pitching has been thriving on the North Side
- Make no mistake: the Cubs are very much about power hitters
- Cubs are giving pitcher Javier Assad a deserved shot
- Cubs: It’s time to start thinking about potential September call-ups
- Cubs: P.J. Higgins deserves to be in the lineup on a daily basis
Following Showalter’s idea of keeping a DH only while the starting pitcher is still in the game does eliminate some strategy early in the game; that is true. However, as a pitcher nears the end of his night, the manager would have the same decisions to make regarding when and how to take out the pitcher, making double switches, using pinch hitters and who to use in relief for how long.
It would basically be like playing an American League game for the first five innings most nights and then shifting gears to what we know as the NL style for the latter part of the game. By doing so, you’d give fans the same strategy they yearn for at the end of games, but you’d also be creating more offense and excitement early in the game by having guys who actually know what they’re doing stepping into the box.
Admittedly, I love National League baseball. But, I can concede and acknowledge that I am extremely biased because I grew up a Cubs fan, and the team has always played in the NL. I also spent the latter part of my childhood and adolescence in Connecticut, far from the Windy City. While there, I listened to WFAN (660) every night while in bed because it was rare that WGN (720) would come in clearly 900 miles away.
WFAN carried Mets games in the 1990s, and the Mets also play in the NL, therefore ensuring I grew up listening to and thinking about games in a National League mindset.
Allowing that same mindset and strategy many of us have always loved to continue, while also allowing for the fact that pitchers just aren’t very good hitters nowadays, sounds like a compromise many progressive and rational baseball fans would be willing to make.
Chicago Cubs: What would this look like at Wrigley Field?
This idea of the designated hitter in the National League is something Chicago Cubs fans should embrace. The way Theo Epstein has constructed this version of the Cubs has created versatility, flexibility and tons of depth.
With a DH for part of the game, that same depth and flexibility he has created for an NL style game would only serve to highlight just how good the Cubs’ young core is, allowing guys like Ian Happ and Kyle Schwarber to get consistent at-bats while still allowing for Joe Maddon‘s mad scientist antics in lineup construction, positional placement and giving guys the rest they need.
If any club were prepared for this type of hybrid designated hitter scenario, it would be the Chicago Cubs. Joe Maddon‘s lineup construction, as well as the current Cubs’ roster construction, is such that it would benefit the club more than most other National League teams.
Imagine a scenario where this idea comes to fruition and Kyle Schwarber is your DH (although I’m very aware he’s just fine in left field) for the first five innings. When Yu Darvish comes out of the game (Yes, hopefully, he is pitching), Maddon is forced to either lose Schwarber for the rest of the game (which he already does many times now with a defensive switch) or double switch him to left field and lose whoever is out there.
Except that guy might be Ian Happ or Ben Zobrist, who could then move to the infield and knock someone else out of the game if Schwarber has had a good night and someone else has struggled.
Seems like the Cubs are inherently and specifically designed for something like this. It also seems like Maddon would be just the type of manager suited for playing under these conditions and rules. Maybe someone could ask him what he thinks about Showalter’s idea?
Better yet, maybe someone could ask Rob Manfred what he thinks about this idea and get it rolling before this incarnation of the Chicago Cubs doesn’t feature so many flexible and versatile players.
I don’t know if this model or idea for the designated hitter is something that will pick up any steam or not, but I sure wouldn’t mind seeing what a lineup of Zobrist, Kris Bryant, Anthony Rizzo, Javier Baez, Schwarber, Willson Contreras, Happ, Heyward, and Albert Almora would do to both National and American League pitching on a consistent basis.