Chicago Cubs: Why the Cubs shouldn’t re-sign John Lackey

Apr 6, 2017; St. Louis, MO, USA; Chicago Cubs starting pitcher John Lackey (41) pitches against the St. Louis Cardinals during the third inning at Busch Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Scott Kane-USA TODAY Sports
Apr 6, 2017; St. Louis, MO, USA; Chicago Cubs starting pitcher John Lackey (41) pitches against the St. Louis Cardinals during the third inning at Busch Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Scott Kane-USA TODAY Sports
4 of 4
Next
Mandatory Credit: Scott Kane-USA TODAY Sports
Mandatory Credit: Scott Kane-USA TODAY Sports /

Cubs starter and MLB’s favorite cowboy John Lackey is going to be a free agent next year.  Now you may love his southern drawl or his incredibly huge teeth, but the Cubs shouldn’t ink him to a deal this offseason.

According to Baseball Reference, the 38-year-old currently has a 5.26 ERA, a WHIP of 1.381, and is a -0.2 WAR player.  Those numbers don’t reflect the $16 million he’s making.

Despite this, Cubs fans seem to want to try to re-sign Lackey to a one or even two-year deal this offseason.  I get that he’s a lovable guy and that if the offense supports him, they’ll win ballgames.

The thing is, the Cubs would benefit the most by letting him find another team to take him or having him retire, then having him take the bump in Cubbie blue another season.

Mandatory Credit: Isaiah J. Downing-USA TODAY Sports
Mandatory Credit: Isaiah J. Downing-USA TODAY Sports /

If a young starter were struggling the way Lackey is right now, that would be one thing.  But John Lackey is not a young starter.

John Lackey has never really been a ‘dominant’ pitcher at any point in his career.  The closest he was to being dominant was in 2014 when he pitched to a 2.77 ERA in 33 games for the rival Cardinals.

2014 is the only season he pitched to under a three ERA (he had a 3.01 ERA in 2007, but that still doesn’t count).  Other than those two years, Lackey is a guy with a career ERA in the fours, which isn’t particularly stellar.

His numbers have jumped significantly from last year to this year.  Even though it’s a small sample size, his ERA went up 1.91 points, his ERA+ is down 42 points, and he is surrounding 1.2 more homers per nine.

If you’ve watched games, Lackey seemingly always gives up a few runs in the first few innings and then battles his way to pitch six innings of five run ball.  That isn’t exactly worth a whopping 16 million big ones.

Mandatory Credit: Tommy Gilligan-USA TODAY Sports
Mandatory Credit: Tommy Gilligan-USA TODAY Sports /

If there is one thing John Lackey has it’s playoff experience.  It was one of the main reasons why the Cubs decided to bring him in at the end of 2015.

But if you dive into his numbers, the man isn’t exactly Madison Bumgarner in the playoffs.  The three-time World Series champ has pitched decently in the World Series, pitching to a 3.45 ERA in seven total games (five of which he started).

The rest of the playoffs up until last year was much of the same.  But en route to the Cubs’ World Series Championship, Lackey had a 6.75 ERA vs. the Giants, a 4.50 ERA against the Dodgers, and a 3.60 ERA vs. the Indians.

Oh and the John Lackey that gives you quality innings, yeah not the case in last year’s playoffs.  In 3 starts, he pitched a total of 13 innings.

Need I remind you of Game 5 of the 2015 NLDS?  When the Cardinals had their backs against the wall and had their ace on the mound, their ace, John Lackey, pitched a masterful three innings and gave up four earned runs.

Lackey may be perceived as a great playoff pitcher, but perception isn’t always reality.

Mandatory Credit: John Hefti-USA TODAY Sports
Mandatory Credit: John Hefti-USA TODAY Sports /

The Cubs could be looking at a starting pitching epidemic.

The common belief is that Jake Arrieta is going to walk this offseason.  So then what are the Cubs left with?

Well, they have an aging Jon Lester, a currently struggling Kyle Hendricks, and that’s about it.  The Cubs need young, controllable starters and they need them badly.  This is even more of a reason why re-signing John Lackey would only hurt them.

Is it smart to go out and pay John Lackey around $10 million for a one-year deal?  N, it isn’t.  Not only are you trying to squeeze every last drop out of Lackey, you are clogging up a spot that could be occupied by a young pitcher.

Whether it is through trades or the free agent market, the Cubs need at least three more long-term starters.  That isn’t always easy to come by either.

Next: Cubs take Lange, Little in first-round

Some of you may be thinking, “We need more offense, offense is the problem”.  While the club has had a tough time in that department this year, pitching is the thing you should be really concerned about.

John Lackey is a great jewelry-seeker and non-haircut getter, he just isn’t what the Cubs need.  It will be tough to say goodbye to Lackey, but everything eventually comes to an end.

Next